One thing that happens though in these threads is people forget what defending a DAW should look like, i.e. the last two pages were glowing hot air. What is it that makes Cubase better to you than other DAWs? It seems like people forget that part of the whole routine? if you're defending the accusation that it's frustrating, give us more than simple praise.
For one I know that Cubase's articulation mapping is pretty straightforward, compared to Logic for instance. Mostly because DP has the same type more or less.
We know that Bitwig has plugin sandboxing and well thought out commands.
Reaper is super user definable, customizable to the nth degree.
DP is a "do everything" DAW, that does songs within songs.
Logic has amazing AI drummers, bass players, a great step sequencer etc.
All I know about Cubase's supposed superiority is it always has the latest tech, although it's not a clip luanching DAW.![:shrug:]( "Shrug")
For one I know that Cubase's articulation mapping is pretty straightforward, compared to Logic for instance. Mostly because DP has the same type more or less.
We know that Bitwig has plugin sandboxing and well thought out commands.
Reaper is super user definable, customizable to the nth degree.
DP is a "do everything" DAW, that does songs within songs.
Logic has amazing AI drummers, bass players, a great step sequencer etc.
All I know about Cubase's supposed superiority is it always has the latest tech, although it's not a clip luanching DAW.
Statistics: Posted by machinesworking — Wed Oct 23, 2024 3:02 am