Yeah those are good points: backward compatibility and priority given that the options are available albeit under different titles. I guess nothing is stopping me from using MFilter it's just that sometimes I forget which EQ does what but knowing that's part of the job, I suppose.Instead of touching MADEQ that looks like breaking compatibility, i think a new fully featured one may be the answer.
In the past i also asked a bandpass, like pro-q3 comes with, but apparently is not easy as it may looks to implement it.
So even if they already have too many eq (yes they already have too much stuff) it may be time for one eq to rule them all, that finally comes with all the things already present on other eq's, such as you asked more slopes, more kind of band (like bandpass) a switch between linear phase and natural phase, a toggle to enable transient/tonal eq if needed and whatever feature to make the "definitive eq".
Anyway is this something with high priority? I don't think so.
I mean i don't know how much time it require to create something like that, but i.e. i still think a proper saturator is way more important. One with the different kind of saturation (multiple tube, multiple tape, fold, and so on) like Saturn and friends.
There is also "mixing revolution" that if i understood correctly, should be in the work, i remember Mr Vsaying that he would work on it if we stop to make feature requests.
I have no clue on what mixing revolution is, so i cannot say what i'd prefer them to focus, but certainly, a proper mastering analyzer, like i wrote here
viewtopic.php?t=609576
Is needed, because there is nothing like that in the market!
saying that he would work on it if we stop to make feature requests.I mixing revolution ever comes, I really hope it has 18dB/oct slopes, that's all I'll say
Statistics: Posted by Hexspa — Thu May 09, 2024 4:05 am